Times Square Tour Bus Accident Leaves 14 People Injured

Times Square Tour Bus Accident Leaves 14 People Injured

Times Square Tour Bus Accident Leaves 14 People Injured

A Gray Line bus driving on Seventh Avenue crashed into a CitySights NY double-decker bus at the corner of 47th Street in Time Square on August 5, 2014.

The Associated Press
The Associated Press

Times Square tour bus accident occurred right next to the TKTS discount tickets booth in one of the busiest areas of Times Square.

Bus windows were shattered and the glass strewn on the pavement.

“The force of the crash brought down a light pole into the plaza next to the booth, and frightening video captured terrified pedestrians running for their lives.”

Cara McCaskill, from Winnipeg, Canada, said: “I saw fire trucks trying to get through all the crazy traffic. And I saw ambulances and blood on the ground.”

The New York City Police Department says 14 of the injured were on foot at the time, including a child in a stroller. Five people were hit by the light pole, and the other nine by debris. The rest of the injured people were on the Gray Line bus. None of the injuries in the Times Square tour bus accident are life-threatening

Liability of the Owners of the Times Square Tour Bus Accident

The New York Daily News is reporting that the driver of one of the Times Square tour bus accident buses had 11 prior license suspensions.

“William Dalambert’s checkered driving past also included nine suspensions of his vehicle registration for a lack of insurance, the New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles reported.”

In fact, on December 1, 2013 Mr. Dalambert was arrested for driving in New Jersey without a license, registration or insurance.

While a driver of a car can be held responsible for negligence if he or she causes an accident, on rare situations an employer can also be held responsible for negligent hiring. This appears to be a very likely possibility in this case. The owner of the bus should be responsible for ensuring that the drive was fit and able to drive.

This tragic Times Square tour bus accident will lead to several lawsuits and hopefully reform in forcing the owners of the bus to be held accountable for their drivers.

Authored by:

Barry v White New York Car Accident Verdict

New York car accident verdict:

Barry v White:

Barry was driving on Columbus when his car was struck by one driven by White. Barry injured his head, back, arms, and legs.
Barry sued White, saying he was speeding and did not brake soon enough.
At the trial on Barry v. White, a jury awarded for Barry.
Barry v White

Barry v White Date of Verdict: May 2013

Barry v White New York car accident verdict: $30,000.00.

Each New York car accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence.

This is a New York car accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by:

Disla v. Cohen New York Car Accident Verdict

New York car accident Verdict:

Disla v. Cohen:

Disla was driving in the middle lane of the Hutchinson River Parkway when he was rear ended.

Disla sued claiming the drivers were negligent in controlling their car. The driver contended that Disla made a sudden turn from the right lane in front of Cohen, causing the accident.
A jury awarded Disla at trial a New York car accident verdict.
Disla v. Cohen New York Car Accident Verdict

Date of Verdict: October 2013

New York car accident verdict: $12,000.00.

Each New York car accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence.

This is a New York car accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by:

Seidenstein v. Szlakowicz New York Pedestrian Accident Verdict

New York pedestrian accident Verdict:

Seidenstein v. Szlakowicz:

Seidenstein was crossing the street at First Avenue and East 59th Street. Szlakowicz made a left turn in the intersection and struck Seidenstein while she was in the cross walk.
Seidenstein filed a lawsuit, saying the driver did not use proper caution while making the turn.

A jury awarded Seidenstein at trial a New York car accident verdict.
Seidenstein v. Szlakowicz New York Pedestrian Accident Verdict

Date of Verdict: October 2013

New York pedestrian accident verdict: $62,800.00.

Each New York pedestrian accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence.

This is a New York pedestrian accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by:

Arroyo v City of New York car accident verdict

New York car accident verdict:

Arroyo v City of New York:

Arroyo was crossing he street when he was hit by a police car.
Arroyo sued the City of New York, claiming the police offer was speeding and carelessly operated his vehicle.
At the trial on Arroyo v City of New York, a jury awarded damages for Arroyo.
Arroyo v City of New York

Arroyo v City of New York Date of Verdict: May 2013

Arroyo v City of New York New York car accident verdict: $80,000.00.

Each New York car accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence.

This is a New York car accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by:

Thiam v Singh New York Car Accident Verdict

New York Car Accident Verdict:

Thiam v Singh:

Thiam was riding his motorcycle when he was hit by a car driven by Singh. As a result of the accident, Thiam suffered back injuries.

In Thiam v Singh, a jury awarded Thiam at trial a verdict.

Thiam v Singh

Thiam v Singh Date of Verdict: March 2013

Thiam v Singh verdict: $74,800.

Each New York car accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence. This is a New York car accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by:

Espinal v Hines-Hall New York Car Accident Verdict

New York Car Accident Verdict:

Espinal v Hines-Hall:

Espinal was a passenger in a private can service. The car was in an accident with a truck in lower Manhattan, and Espinal was injured.

In Espinal v Hines-Hall, a jury awarded Espinal at trial a verdict.

Espinal v Hines-Hall

Espinal v Hines-Hall Date of Verdict: March 2013

Espinal v Hines-Hall verdict: $818,800.

Each New York car accident verdict situation is different, and it is vital to have your case evaluated to determine if all the elements of negligence are present. Having an experienced, knowledgeable, hardworking, and caring attorney from Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. handle your case will provide you with the best chancing of receiving the large and fair settlement that you deserve. Our legal team will send investigators to the site to conduct examination into the circumstances involved to research the intersection, question witnesses, and take statements. We immediately send claim letters to alert the insurance and require the potential defendants to preserve all relevant evidence. This is a New York car accident verdict. These have been recorded with the courts. They are examples, not to be construed as previous results from our firm. They are meant to provide you with guidance to understand the potential value of your injuries.

With our solid hard working reputation for our clients and tough litigators and settlement skills, Daniel Szalkiewicz & Associates, P.C. can swiftly and caringly bring your case to a favorable resolution. Do not suffer in silence any longer; call our team today to discuss your options for pursuing justice and ensuring your rights are protected. We provide exceptionally qualified legal counsel, and to make sure our clients are not hurt twice, we only take a 31.5% contingency fee, compared to the industry standard one/third to 45.00%. If we don’t win for you, you owe us nothing.

Authored by: